so…if you tell your what your needs and wants are by your state of fear regarding their absence, you cannot manifest desire.
Desire brings a new state of reality, and by releasing your fear, you step into it.
If you confuse desire with want and needs, you shouldn’t be surprised at the effect.
Now, If you want a definitive reference as to the how and way of this, why I think I’m right-
Read the Anthema of Zos
Synthesis:
Needs or wants cannot be manifested correctly due to the inherent NATURE of the symbology behind the terms.
If the universe exists as expereince, then changing needs or wants does not redefine the experience, nor the awareness of the experience.
Needing has a negative draw. Implictly involves “taking” as it’s follow through action.
Wanting is a mixed draw. It implies a lack of a quality within the situation based on need, and since need cannot change expereince….
Desire cannot take.
Desire in and of itself, is the act of creation. just of circumstance, but or perspective.
Desire is not an action, but is a movement INTO.
Crwoley understood thus renamed “Strength” to Lust. In doing so he aknowledged that true strength comes from the ability separate need and want from Desire.
Spare understood this separation in the Alphabet of Desire. In creating a set of circumstances which did not have to do with our embedment in time/space by need. The Alphabet of Desire functions by creating a set of symbols which have to do with creation of a new space rather than changing the one we are in.
Reality functions, at a quantum level, by everyone agreeing on it. Once in place, it cannot be changed. Our emotions and attatchments fix us in time and space. And fear of something, of anything, is the strongest emotion there is. It is primal. It IS.
Workings done what for what we need often fail because they are attatched to the emotion of fear. We are held in place by it. Reality is held in place by it.
Fear holds everything in place because it has the potential to shape the next possibility it’s own. It is entropic by nature. Thus when you throw need into the work, fear follows innateley.
Obsession is the hard-line and irrefutable result of Need as Desire, with the inevitable manifestation of Fear.
Observations:
Want and need differ from desire.
Need is associated with self.
Want is associated with situation.
Desire is associated with…stars?
Need and want refer to each other. Desire does not refer to either.
Need is something which, if repressed or denied, can result in a forceful action. It is tied heavily with self preservation
Want is similar to need, but has to do with the current situation or circumstance. Not seen as potentially violent, inherently.
Need denotes a complete lack, or absence.
Want denotes a diminishing. What you seek is there, but is not as much as you require.
Desire is separate from the emotional values attatched to need or want.
Need is that which defines you.
Want defines the self.
Desire defines the universe.
Desire
tr.v. de·sired, de·sir·ing, de·sires
1. To wish or long for; want.
2. To express a wish for; request.
n.
1. A wish or longing.
2. A request or petition.
3. The object of longing: My greatest desire is to go back home.
4. Sexual appetite; passion.
[Middle English desiren, from Old French desirer, from Latin dēsīderāre : dē-, de- + sīdus, sīder-, star.]
c.1230, from O.Fr. desirer, from L. desiderare “long for, wish for,” original sense perhaps “await what the stars will bring,” from the phrase de sidere “from the stars,” from sidus (gen. sideris) “heavenly body, star, constellation” (but see consider). Noun sense of “lust” is first recorded c.1340.
v. want·ed, want·ing, wants
v. tr.
1.
1. To desire greatly; wish for: They want to leave. She wants a glass of water. See Synonyms at desire.
2. To desire (someone to do something): I want you to clean your room.
3. To request the presence or assistance of: You are wanted by your office.
4. To seek with intent to capture: The fugitive is wanted by the police.
2.
1. To request the presence or assistance of: You are wanted by your office.
2. To seek with intent to capture: The fugitive is wanted by the police.
3. To have an inclination toward; like: Say what you want, but be tactful.
4. Informal To be obliged (to do something): You want to be careful on the ice.
5. To be without; lack. See Synonyms at lack.
6. To be in need of; require: “‘Your hair wants cutting,’ said the Hatter” (Lewis Carroll).
v. intr.
1. To have need: wants for nothing.
2. To be destitute or needy.
3. To be disposed; wish: Call me daily if you want.
n.
1. The condition or quality of lacking something usual or necessary: stayed home for want of anything better to do.
2. Pressing need; destitution: lives in want.
3. Something desired: a person of few wants and needs.
4. A defect of character; a fault.
Phrasal Verb(s):
want in Slang
1. To desire greatly to enter: The dog wants in.
2. To wish to join a project, business, or other undertaking.
want out Slang
1. To desire greatly to leave: The cat wants out.
2. To wish to leave a project, a business, or other undertaking.
[Middle English wanten, to be lacking, from Old Norse vanta; see euə- in Indo-European roots.]
And me, his parent, would full soon devour For want of other prey. –Milton.
Pride is as loud a beggar as want, and more saucy. –Franklin.
Nothing is so hard for those who abound in riches, as to conceive how others can be in want. –Swift.
They that want honesty, want anything. –Beau. & Fl.
The unhappy never want enemies. –Richardson.
The disposition, the manners, and the thoughts are all before it; where any of those are wanting or imperfect, so much wants or is imperfect in the imitation of human life. –Dryden.
For as in bodies, thus in souls, we find What wants in blood and spirits, swelled with wind. –Pope.
c.1200, “to be lacking,” from O.N. vanta “to lack, want,” earlier *wanaton, from P.Gmc. *wanen, from PIE *we-no-, from base *eue- “to leave, abandon, give out” (see vain).
c.1300, “deficiency, shortage,” from O.N. vant, neut. of vanr “wanting, deficient;” related to O.E. wanian “to diminish” (see wane). Phrase for want of is recorded from c.1400. Meaning “state of destitution” is recorded from 1340
The reason many people do not understand the way desire works.
Let’s define so you see the difference.
NEED:
noun
1. a requirement, necessary duty, or obligation: There is no need for you to go there.
2. a lack of something wanted or deemed necessary: to fulfill the needs of the assignment.
3. urgent want, as of something requisite: He has no need of your charity.
4. necessity arising from the circumstances of a situation or case: There is no need to worry.
5. a situation or time of difficulty; exigency: to help a friend in need; to be a friend in need.
6. a condition marked by the lack of something requisite: the need for leadership.
7. destitution; extreme poverty: The family’s need is acute.
–verb (used with object)
8. to have need of; require: to need money.
–verb (used without object)
9. to be under an obligation (used as an auxiliary, typically in an interrogative or in a negative statement, and fol. by infinitive, in certain cases without to; in the 3d pers. sing. the form is need, not needs): He need not go.
10. to be in need or want.
11. to be necessary: There needs no apology.
—Idiom
12. if need be, should the necessity arise: If need be, I can type the letters myself.
Origin:
bef. 900; (n.) ME nede, OE nēd (WSaxon nīed), c. G Not, ON nauth, Goth nauths; (v.) ME neden, OE nēodian, deriv. of the n.
Synonyms:
2, 3. See lack. 3. requirement. 4. Need, necessity imply a want, a lack, or a demand, which must be filled. Need, a word of Old English origin, has connotations that make it strong in emotional appeal: the need to be appreciated. Necessity, a word of Latin origin, is more formal and impersonal or objective; though much stronger than need in expressing urgency or imperative demand, it is less effective in appealing to the emotions: Water is a necessity for living things. 5. emergency. 7. neediness, indigence, penury, privation. See poverty. 8. want, lack.
[Middle English nede, from Old English nēod, nēd, distress, necessity.]
And the city had no need of the sun. –Rev. xxi. 23.
I have no need to beg. –Shak.
Be governed by your needs, not by your fancy. –Jer. Taylor.
2. Want of the means of subsistence; poverty; indigence; destitution. –Chaucer.
Famine is in thy cheeks; Need and oppression starveth in thine eyes. –Shak.
3. That which is needful; anything necessary to be done; (pl.) necessary things; business. [Obs.] –Chaucer.
4. Situation of need; peril; danger. [Obs.] –Chaucer.
Syn: Exigency; emergency; strait; extremity; necessity; distress; destitution; poverty; indigence; want; penury.
Usage: Need, Necessity. Necessity is stronger than need; it places us under positive compulsion. We are frequently under the necessity of going without that of which we stand very greatly in need. It is also with the corresponding adjectives; necessitous circumstances imply the direct pressure of suffering; needy circumstances, the want of aid or relief.
Need
Need\, v. t. [imp. & p. p. Needed; p. pr. & vb. n. Needing.] [See Need, n. Cf. AS. n?dan to force, Goth. nau?jan.] To be in want of; to have cause or occasion for; to lack; to require, as supply or relief.
Other creatures all day long Rove idle, unemployed, and less need rest. –Milton.
Need
Need\, v. i. To be wanted; to be necessary. –Chaucer.
When we have done it, we have done all that is in our power, and all that needs. –Locke.
PAY ATTENTION TO THIS PART! THIS IS WHERE YOU SEE THE MIMETIC DIFFUSION>>>>ALL THE WAYS THE WORD MEANS AT ITS ROOT CONTEXT!
need (n.)
O.E. nied (W.Saxon), ned (Mercian) “necessity, compulsion, duty,” originally “violence, force,” from P.Gmc. *nauthis (cf. O.N. nauðr, O.Fris. ned, M.Du. nood, Ger. Not, Goth. nauþs “need”), probably cognate with O.Pruss. nautin “need,” and perhaps with O.C.S. nazda, Rus. nuzda, Pol. nedza “misery, distress,” from PIE *nau- “death, to be exhausted.” The more common O.E. word for “need, necessity, want” was ðearf, but they were connected via a notion of “trouble, pain,” and the two formed a compound, niedðearf “need, necessity, compulsion, thing needed.” Nied also may have been infl. by O.E. neod “desire, longing,” which was often spelled the same. Common in O.E. compounds, e.g. niedfaru “compulsory journey,” a euphemism for “death;” niedhæmed “rape,” the second element being an O.E. word meaning “sexual intercourse;” niedling “slave.” Meaning “extreme poverty, destitution” is from c.1200. The verb is O.E. neodian “be necessary,” from the noun. Phrase the needful “money” is attested from 1774. The adj. phrase need-to-know is attested from 1954.
All sources : Online Etymology Dictionary, © 2001 Douglas Harper
Understand that this post is very difficult for me to write…not due to words or lack of knowledge, but due to emotional fuzziness.
To start- understand where my voice is coming from.
“It was pretty big year for fashion
A lousy year for rock and roll
The people gave their blessing to crimes of passion
It was a dark, dark night of the collective soul
And I was somewhere out on riverside by the el royale hotel
When a stranger appeared in a cloud of smoke
I thought I knew him all too well
He said
Now that I have your attention
I got something I wanna say
You may not wanna hear it, Im gonna tell it to you anyway
You know Ive always like you boy
Cause you were not afraid of me
Things are gonna get mighty rough here in Gomorrah-by-the-sea
You said
It’s just like home
Its so damn hot I cant stand it
My fine seersucker suit is all soaking wet
And the hills are burning
And the wind is raging
And the clock strikes midnight
in the Garden of Allah
Nice car
Ah, I love those Bavarians
So meticulous
Y’know I remember when things were a lot more fun around here
When good was good and evil was evil.
Before things got so fuzzy.
I was once a golden boy like you
And I was summoned to the halls of power in the heavenly courts
And I dined with the deities who looked upon me with favor,
For my talents, my creativity
And we sat beneath the palms
In the warm afternoons and drank the wine
With Fitzgerald and Huxley
And they pawned the biting phrase from the tongues hot with blood
And drained their pens of bitter ink
Vainly reaching for the bottle full of empty edens
Branded especially for the ones who had come with great expectations
To the perfumed halls of allah, for their time in the sun
And we were stokin the fires and oilin up the machinery
Until the gods found out we had ideas of our own
And war was coming and the earth was shaking
And there was no more ruin in the Garden of Allah
Today I made an appearance downtown
I am an expert witness because I say I am
And I said gentlemen, and I use that world loosely
I will testify for you, Im a gun for hire,Im a saint, Im a liar
Because there are no facts, there is no truth
Just data to be manipulated
I can get you any result you like
Whats it worth to you?
Because there is no wrong, there is no right
And I sleep very well at night
No shame, no solution, no remorse, no retribution
Just people selling t-shirts
Just opportunity to participate in the pathetic little circus
And winning, winning, winning
It was pretty big year for predators
The marketplace was on a roll
And the land of opportunity
Spawned a whole new breed of men without souls
This year notoriety got all confused with fame
And the devil is downhearted babe, cause
Theres nothing left for him to claim
He said its just like home
Its so low-down I cant stand it
I guess my work around here has all been done
And the fruit is rotten, the serpents eyes shine
As he wraps around the vine,
In the Garden of Allah.”
-Don Henley, “The Garden of Allah
Nothing…- nothing-…. destroys a work of any kind, like two things.
A lack of trust in self, and a lack of trust in others.
Nothing breaks trust like information which is shared in the confidence and faith of a relationship (of any kind) which you choose to think of as stable–which is then shared with others outside that relationship.
It doesn’t matter whether than information was factual or not. In retrospect, I would often say that if the value of that information was such that if it could only have been imparted under the value of that information, the person imparting it must have believed it to be true.
The contamination factor happens because of what is commonly called “spin”, but in fact should be called “distorted reflection”.
No-one can impart information EXACTLY the way it was imparted to them. That is a law of communication. The value placed on certain words, image, and so on- the conscious and the subconscious make small adjustments-”tweaking” them, so that the information inevitably becomes imbued withthe viewpoint of the person relaying it.
This leads one to certain uncomfortable deductions.
You can never tell someone the ABSOLUTE TRUTH. Many are incapable, and if they are capable, it’s all to likely that such a transmission would cause a sort of psychic trauma to the reciever.
As a species, for us to communicate, the truth must be distorted in some way for it to be recieved well. We, as a species, cannot swallow a bitter pill without some sort of candy coating. That most people, even when they think they are telling the truth, are always….always…half-lying. Whether they are aware of it or not.
People who are capable of telling the absolute truth must, in the process, become aware of the problem. In doing so they realize that “truth” is always perspective. That to truly engage in “clear dialog”, one must be aware of the perspectives of both themselves and the other person.
In being aware of both perspectives, the information passed must reflect both perspectives to be completley valid.
To be aware of perspective and value the information passed back and forth, one must accept the perspective as what it is. If one person can see both perspectives, and the other cannot, then in a very practicical sense, you are trying to bridge one reality to another. And things that come from reality to another will always appear “unreal”, “illusory”, and therefore not “true”.
Because in the reality where there is only one viewpoint, the information which comes from a differnent viewpoint is not only alien, and therefore intrusive, but simply has nothing which can be validated on that side of reality.
If in one’ person’s reality it doesnt “exist”, the information will always be seen as false.
And the absolute SHIT of it is, that if the person who sees more than one perspective becomes frustrated by the lack of comprehension on the other side, then one is left with two choices.
One choice is to keep screaming, but in the end that simply reinforces the idea that BOTH sides are in “bubble realities”. Forcing communication is often seen as an attempt of invalidation of perspective. Both sides would never achieve true communication, regardless of motives.
Therefore, the person who can understand both perspectives has only one choice. If both perspectives are valid, one cannot “shout down” the other perspective out of respect for that perspective. You only have one option after that.
Move on.
Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!
